Skip to main content

*BONUS POST* Project 1 Revisited/Revisions

If you didn’t complete project 1 or were considering revising it, this post is for you! Here’s what I’d like you to do:

Just like I asked you to do for Project 1, I’d like you to write a post that explains how you define rhetoric. That’s really it— a shorter, blog-style post that breaks down your understanding of rhetoric based on what we’ve discussed this semester.

If you’re somehow worried about your posts above, or end up skipping one for whatever reason, write a response to this post and I’ll consider it “extra credit.”

Again, I’m positive nobody will need it, but nonetheless, I wanted to make sure I provide an option for folks who may have already been a bit behind to catch up.

If you didn’t complete Project 1, and you complete all 6 posts, your average assessment for the blog posts will apply to Projects 1-4.

If you planned to revise Project 1, responding to this post (with a note about that) will allow you to replace your Project 1 assessment with your assessment for this post.

This should be an easy chance to get a 50 or 100 on Project 1, depending on what you already submitted, what your assessment was, or what you still need to do.


As a reminder, when assessing your work on this post, I'll be considering the following questions:
  • Does this post contain at least 300-500 words?
  • Does this post respond to all questions/elements of the prompt?
  • Does this post bring in examples (from the writer’s own experiences, outside sources, and/or games)?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post # 1: Shifts in Our Understanding of Computer Games

After our readings from Bogost and Schell this semester, how has your understanding of computer games shifted?  Write a blog post that reflects on your own experience with games before this course, and how things like procedural rhetoric and the Elemental Tetrad have shifted that (if at all).  Feel free to bring in, discuss, and analyze any specific examples from the texts and/or the games we’ve played to emphasize this. As a reminder, when assessing your work on this post, I'll be considering the following questions: Does this post contain at least 300-500 words? Does this post respond to all questions/elements of the prompt? Does this post bring in examples (from the writer’s own experiences, outside sources, and/or games)?

Post #3: Planning Out a Game Design

For this post, I’d like you to apply Schell’s Elemental Tetrad. So, like I’d asked you to do for Project 3, I want you to elaborate on how you would like to design a computer game of your choosing. Naturally, I want you to include the following: What is your theme? What aesthetics make sense for that theme? What mechanics make sense for that theme? What narrative makes sense for that theme? What technology do you think could help you accomplish the goals outlined above? As a reminder, when assessing your work on this post, I'll be considering the following questions: Does this post contain at least 300-500 words? Does this post respond to all questions/elements of the prompt? Does this post bring in examples (from the writer’s own experiences, outside sources, and/or games)?

Post #2: Analyzing Procedural Rhetoric

Project 2 asked you to complete an analysis of a game of your choosing, and discuss how procedural rhetoric functioned in it. In this post, I’d mainly like you to focus on laying out the basics of our work in Project 2— analyzing how a game of your choosing uses processes to make an argument or express something. For this post, I’d like you to take one of 2 paths: First, if you already wrote this in the style of a traditional research project? Simply paste your work into a blog post—no additional work required. If you haven’t gotten too far on it, then I’d like to encourage you to write this in a more informal blog-style analysis. Think of the analytical/experience-driven work you might see on sites like Kotaku or Polygon . No MLA formatting and “proper” citations required, but feel free to hyperlink to things as it makes sense to do so. As a reminder, when assessing your work on this post, I'll be considering the following questions: Does this post contain at least 300-50...